Posted by Jeff (126.96.36.199) on November 09, 2001 at 14:57:29:
In Reply to: Jeff: Lying doesn't help you posted by Jeff - Ghassan's response on November 08, 2001 at 21:18:31:
It never helped you, either.
Written by Jeff on 09 Nov 2001 21:50:55:
As an answer to: Jeff: Lying doesn't help you written by Ghassan on 08 Nov 2001 21:51:52:
>The fact Janey puts a great "dinner that got more compliments from corporations than it EVER has?" is hardly an accomplishment to boast about, unless, you judge people by the quality of food they put in your belly.
&&&&& Actually, that is incorrect. She didn't put on the "dinner", meaning... she didn't cook the dinner. The average person knows that "put on the dinner" (when speaking about an awards banquet similar to the CFA's) means that she organized it, put together the program booklet, and the "program" of speakers and entertainment. So, it IS an accomplishment, but not to boast about. Janey didn't boast, that's not her style. I posted that everybody enjoyed and complimented the dinner that she put on to highlight the fact that she does hard work for the CFA (a Chaldean organization), and why wouldn't she.. she IS Chaldean, you know?
>Now, may be you weren't talking about the food but rather about the "organization of the party itself".
&&&&&&& D'oh! Looks like I read too fast. It's my kid tendency (that depends on how you define kid, the legal definition being someone who is age 17 or below.) Of course, I don't fit into that category.
Yes, I have been informed that after Janey's "exposure" on the Internet she has been "doubling her hours" of work!!
&&&&&&& I love it when you say things like that. That's what one calls heresay, rumor, etc. Exactly who told you that? How many hours a work did she work before you started badmouthing and insulting her (you can call that exposure, although the exposure reflects more on yourself being exposed for what you are than her being exposed for anyting) on the internet, compared to after? Have you seen her time-cards? How do you actually know this? The answer is, you don't, unless you can provide names. I can provide names, facts, etc. because I know the Chaldeans and I know what I'm talking about. You say that your "sources" told you this and that about Janey, Atour, Fred P@rhad, anyone that you want to badmouth. What do your great "sources" tell you about me? You haven't found any dirt yet in your search, have you?
>I sure must "charge" the CFA for such "impressive" improvement in Janey's quality of work!!
&&&&&&& BS BS BS
>Yes, Atour Golani was acknowledged. CFA dinner party is sure not a place to "pick fights at".
>No where in my original post have I stated or claimed that John Nimrod or Atour Golani "were PERSONALLY ignored" as you're claiming. That's a LIE. The post is still there and anyone can read it and verify its contents. It talked about "complaints" by John Nimrod HIMSELF (i.e. not my own making) about "not recognizing or mentioning the word Assyrian" (acknowleding Atour Golani as a President of a group with a title that include that word was not Mr. Nirmod's concern, but more the "political content"). Anyway, ASK Mr. John Nimrod about "what ticked him off?"
&&&&&& Ghassan, dear, you thought you had me. Of course you don't, though. The point was that you insulted Atour many times BEFORE that statement, and the fact that he worked his tail off to help the CFA disproves your lies and "Assyrianism" conspiracy theories.
>Also, NO where have I ever called Mr. Atour Golani "an agent" (an agent of who? What I've said is his wife, Janey, is HIS agent for the Assyrian Federation inside the CFA). That's another LIE. So far you have lied TWICE.
&&&&& Talk about LIES? Ghassan, you badmouth Atour, Janey, Me, P@rhad, everybody that disagrees with your extreme views. You even take the time to fax selected posts to various Clergy, and Chaldean leaders around the Detroit area, the majority of whom have told me personally that you do not act your age, and that they don't want to be associated with such extremists. How I wish I could tell you how many people told me that, but I wouldn't want to expose them to the venom of your public internet attacks on their character, family, etc.
>If I am assuming that Mr. Golani has "convinced" the President of Ford, then I have to assume that what you're saying is either the CFA has some problem with the Ford company that it needed Atour Golani to intervene and "convince" its President to be the keynote speaker!!! or that Ford President was too embarrassed to be the keynote speaker in a party attended by the Michigan State Governor, Senators, Congressmen, and many other officials!! I can see that Atour Golani REALLY did a lot of "convincing" there.
&&&&& Again, since you are not in Detroit and have no idea what you are talking about, you will have to understand when I say that I WAS present when a member of the CFA called Janey and I heard them speak about having Atour get the keynote speaker. You are never present.. you are across the country, screaming, faxing, and posting lies always.
>Even if he did, that hardly will make up for adding his signature to a letter that claimed "Chaldeans are a religious sect that is part of his Assyrian nation". More, sending that letter without even waiting for Mr. Saad Marouf, the CFA President's response (that was agreed between the two of them over a phone conversation). May be, Mr. Golani's "convincing" was his way to make up for his back stabbing the CFA?
&&&&&& There you go again insulting Atour. You don't even know the man. You are such a coward.
>I can see young kids like you got quite impressed by such games. It sure gave you what you thought was the "needed ammunition to attack Ghassan!"
Define "young kids". Are your children young? Your age won't get you out of the hole that you have dug for yourself, with your lies!
>Finally, you have called me "sick extremist". That's an insult from an ill mannered kid like you.
Ill-mannered, I believe that's the phrase you used to describe P@rhad before you banned him. Looks like I'm next on the list to be banned from this 3rd world tyrant forum.
>If you ever use such language with me again, your message will be deleted. If you don't have manners to show (which I doubt it since you so much loved the filthy language of Parhad) then DON'T post on this Forum.
Funny how that's all you can say about me. I finally see through you.
Post a Followup