Posted by Andreas from dtm2-t8-2.mcbone.net (184.108.40.206) on Thursday, May 29, 2003 at 11:55AM :
In Reply to: Why not Syriac? posted by Sadie from ? (220.127.116.11) on Thursday, May 29, 2003 at 10:34AM :
: : "Assyr-Aramaic" or "Aramaic-Assyr"?
: xxx I see nothing wrong with calling the language Syriac, with different dialects (Eastern & Western). Do you?
+++ Sadie, don't haggle with ME ...
1) You did NOT answer the original question in any way
2) You are trying to make an undercover deal with me: Personally I wouldn't call this primitive mumbo-jambo of todaqy's Syriac/neo-Aramaic/neo-Assyrian a languaga at all.
+++ It's dying. Bye-bye.
+++ But I love Aramaic/Syriac:
It brought down the Assyrian empire.
Not as God's rod, but as God's tongue.
Intermittently some physical pressure was needed to wipe out that self-cultish Assyrian regime.
-- signature .
Post a Followup