Counsellor: But is it "possessive"?

[Follow Ups] [Post Followup] [Our Discussion Forum]

Posted by Andreas from ( on Wednesday, June 04, 2003 at 1:50PM :

In Reply to: It OUGHT to be: posted by Sadie from ? ( on Wednesday, June 04, 2003 at 1:28PM :

: : 2) "The War Profiteers' Card Deck"

: "Profiteers'" is plural possessive. If a noun or pronoun, singular or plural, ends in an "s," to make the noun's or pronoun's case possessive, one only needs to add an apostrophe. I do not know why, though.

+++ Counsellor: But is it "possessive" to all?

+++ The Americanish way of writing this expression conveys the idea they do NOT interpret it as an "possessive" construction and simply patch the words together to a amorphous string of loosely connected ingredients:
e.g. without any internal semantic-morphological structure.

+++ Could this also be an indicator of the the general amorphization of the American brains?

+++ The phenomenon is not restrichted to this phrase, it's abundant: whenever any logical-semantic structuring is needed, Americans (in contrast to the Brits, Canadians ...) smash it all together and stir up the soup.

-- Andreas
-- signature .

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

E-Mail: ( default )
Optional Link ( default )
Optional Image Link ( default )

This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from