Posted by Sadie from ? (22.214.171.124) on Wednesday, June 11, 2003 at 4:46PM :
Industry wants to gobble up more radio frequencies.... Profit, profit, profit at the expense of basic scientific research (including climate research). Hm....
Nature 423, 675 (12 June, 2003)
Car-safety lobby on collision course with researchers
After years of fighting off interference from radio transmitters and broadcast satellites, astronomers are worried that an emerging technology — collision-avoidance radar for cars — could pose the biggest threat yet to some of their observations.
The astronomers' concerns are this time shared by Earth scientists, who say that the radars could mess up their observation of the atmosphere from satellites. But they face an uphill battle in confronting the commercial interests that support the car radars — not to mention the universally popular goal of increased road safety.
So far, only a handful of luxury cars, including models produced by Cadillac, Mercedes-Benz and BMW, offer onboard radar systems that alert drivers when other cars come too close. But their use is expected to widen in the next decade, and US and European regulators are already planning to allocate a share of the radio spectrum to it.
A ruling by the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last year allowed the use of car radars at a frequency of 24 gigahertz (GHz). But both NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration opposed that frequency allocation on the grounds that it could interfere with scientific observations.
For radio astronomers, the 24-GHz band is an important frequency for detecting ammonia — a common extraterrestrial molecule. Studies show that millions of car radars operating at that frequency would "absolutely guarantee to close down the whole band" for astronomy, says Wim van Driel, a radio astronomer at the Paris Observatory.
For climate researchers, the frequency sits squarely in a band that serves as a signature of water vapour in the atmosphere.
John Zuzek, who works on spectrum management issues at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Ohio, says that although other agencies were consulted about the FCC rule, studies showing interference problems with scientific observations were essentially ignored. Zuzek and other researchers say that the FCC is under strong pressure from industry to approve the commercial allocations. "We were kind of forced to go along with what happened, but with a lot of reservations," he says.
Eventually, car radar systems operating at higher frequencies — around 77 GHz — are expected to emerge, but these are currently more expensive to make. European regulators are therefore recommending a phased approach, first using the 24-GHz systems, then phasing in the 77-GHz systems as the devices become more common in vehicles.
Shifting to the higher frequencies would suit astronomers — although echoes of 77-GHz signals could still be picked up by sensitive radio dishes listening at the 226–231.5-GHz band, one of the 'windows' in the atmosphere that is transparent to radio observers on the ground.
Several other issues of concern to researchers will be on the agenda at the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-03), a giant round of international talks on dividing up the radio spectrum, which kicks off in Geneva this week. Among the most pressing items are allocations in the 5-GHz range for wireless computer networks. If these proliferate, they could interfere with satellite-based imaging radars used for Earth observation.
Historically, astronomers have been fairly successful at winning protection from encroachment by commercial radio services. And scientists took heart last November when an FCC spectrum task force reaffirmed that "radio astronomy may need to have dedicated, protected spectrum bands for the foreseeable future, due to its highly sensitive applications and the fact that its benefits accrue to society as a whole".
Yet the combination of scarce spectrum, new uses of the air waves, and the anti-regulatory slant of the current FCC makes this ever more difficult. Astronomers like their mobile phones and wireless Internet connections as much as anyone else, says van Driel, who chairs the European Science Foundation's Committee on Radio Astronomy Frequencies. And he admits that appearing to oppose a technology that could improve road safety "makes us look bad". But in the scramble for spectrum, he insists, "we have the right to be protected".
Nature © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2003 Registered No. 785998 England.
-- signature .
Post a Followup