Posted by Lilly from libsci111.library.Vanderbilt.Edu (126.96.36.199) on Thursday, June 13, 2002 at 11:10AM :
In Reply to: To Lilly and Fred posted by Jeff from bgp01107368bgs.wbrmfd01.mi.comcast.net (188.8.131.52) on Thursday, June 13, 2002 at 10:38AM :
: I'm tempted to Delete these ridiculous arguments of yours.
xxx Don't - he deserves everything he does to his name because he's got so much pride - he actually thinks he can insinuate anything he wants to & get away with it.
: That's why I'm not taking sides.
xxx Thanks. I don't want you to, either. This is an argument between the 2 of us, but it's going to be on this forum because I don't want him emailing me with those crazy insinuations of his.
: Also, I have an unrelated question for you both. Fred said that if he were a woman, he'd be a Lesbian. Lilly said that if she were a guy, she'd be Gay.
: What about being "bisexual"?? Would you consider that?
xxx I was making a similar nonsensical statement back at Fred. Fred doesn't know what the hell he's talking about - if he were a woman, please - it's not possible, how the hell does he know what he'd want if he were a woman? It's like me saying, if I were a horse, I'd hate saddles. How does he KNOW these things? Maybe some horses like saddles, maybe some don't. Maybe his mind will change when he takes on a whole new gender perspective.
xxx I call myself sexual only in the context of my lover - who is currently male. & when I'm single, I'm asexual until I meet someone I want to make love with & who wants me in a similar way. Make sense? I tended a lot more toward the asexual after my freshman year in undergrad until I met my boyfriend.
-- signature .
Post a Followup