Re: Pledge of Allegiance

[Follow Ups] [Post Followup] [Our Discussion Forum]

Posted by Tony Zango from ? ( on Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 3:24PM :

In Reply to: Pledge of Allegiance posted by Jeff from ( on Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 1:55PM :

I have a better one.

God, King, Country

Iranian pledge prior to Islamic Republic.


: I always wondered why "under God" was in the pledge, because it seemed to violate the separation between Church and State, but...

: ==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
: Pledge Declared Unconstitutional
: Wed Jun 26, 2:31 PM ET

: By DAVID KRAVETS, Associated Press Writer

: SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Pledge of Allegiance is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion and cannot be recited in schools.

: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ( news - web sites) overturned a 1954 act of Congress inserting the phrase "under God" after the words "one nation" in the pledge. The court said the phrase violates the so-called Establishment Clause in the Constitution that requires a separation of church and state.

: "A profession that we are a nation `under God' is identical, for Establishment Clause purposes, to a profession that we are a nation `under Jesus,' a nation `under Vishnu,' a nation `under Zeus,' or a nation `under no god,' because none of these professions can be neutral with respect to religion," Judge Alfred T. Goodwin wrote for the three-judge panel.

-- Tony Zango
-- signature .

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

E-Mail: ( default )
Optional Link ( default )
Optional Image Link ( default )

This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from