Re: Pledge of Allegiance


[Follow Ups] [Post Followup] [Our Discussion Forum]


Posted by Tony Zango from ? (167.88.192.30) on Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 3:24PM :

In Reply to: Pledge of Allegiance posted by Jeff from bgp01107368bgs.wbrmfd01.mi.comcast.net (68.42.59.180) on Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 1:55PM :


I have a better one.

God, King, Country

Iranian pledge prior to Islamic Republic.

Tony

: I always wondered why "under God" was in the pledge, because it seemed to violate the separation between Church and State, but...

:
: ==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
: Pledge Declared Unconstitutional
: Wed Jun 26, 2:31 PM ET

: By DAVID KRAVETS, Associated Press Writer

: SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Pledge of Allegiance is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion and cannot be recited in schools.

: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ( news - web sites) overturned a 1954 act of Congress inserting the phrase "under God" after the words "one nation" in the pledge. The court said the phrase violates the so-called Establishment Clause in the Constitution that requires a separation of church and state.

: "A profession that we are a nation `under God' is identical, for Establishment Clause purposes, to a profession that we are a nation `under Jesus,' a nation `under Vishnu,' a nation `under Zeus,' or a nation `under no god,' because none of these professions can be neutral with respect to religion," Judge Alfred T. Goodwin wrote for the three-judge panel.



-- Tony Zango
-- signature .



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail: ( default )
Subject:
Message:
Optional Link ( default )
URL:
Title:
Optional Image Link ( default )
URL:


This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com