Posted by andreas from p3EE3C6AA.dip.t-dialin.net (18.104.22.168) on Sunday, November 24, 2002 at 8:44AM :
In Reply to: ADM Vs. APP posted by Tiglath from 171.e.012.mel.iprimus.net.au (22.214.171.124) on Saturday, November 23, 2002 at 11:10PM :
: And while he is against the censorship of art he also didn't want to offend his hosts who assumed they were serving ADM.
: Truth is that the Rabel Shmuel incident wasn't just a case of censorship.
+++ The truth is:
It's still an outraging case of censorship + a whoppy cover up by ADM's Rapy Jacko by staging a glossy distraction ("he's against censorship") towards minor functionaries and abandonement of his own responsibility + a focus shift towards newly and handily emerged aspects of political conflict ("ADM vs. APP") + finally Rapy Jacko's failure to clarify and correct the situation at all instead of underpinning it.
+++ Plus the additional truth:
That though no original hards facts of censorship have changed but have rather been added up by an influx of new primitive motives and have worsened by denial, explaining away, distraction, responsibility shifting, exploiting false priorities ("he didn't want to offend his hosts") obfuscation and silent abetting - the most visible and effective change under this barrage of nonsense is the change your state of mind has undergone for the sake of a mental alignment to better fit the official propaganda and its slimey & swampy & winding excuses.
+++ Do you really swallow this phony nonsense of Rapy Jacko ?
+++ And you endorse it and underwrite to it?
-- signature .
Post a Followup