Posted by andreas from p3EE3C6A1.dip.t-dialin.net (126.96.36.199) on Thursday, December 05, 2002 at 2:29AM :
In Reply to: Re: (Islam:) Virgins? What virgins? posted by pancho from pool0428.cvx20-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net (188.8.131.52) on Wednesday, December 04, 2002 at 5:23PM :
: It's funny...we take the interpretations in the Koran literraly...when it suits us.
: We defend our own nonsense no matter what. Turns out the word for "rope" was misinterpreted as "camel". Being a holy book we never questioned the meaning of a camel going through the eye of a needle.
: But there's a lesson here...if you would have a piece of nonsense swallowed...feed the prospective diner nothing but nonsense for ten years prior at least. He'll swallow a camel whole after that.
+++ Hey Pudding Brain of Ashur's grace, lost orientation again?
+++ Read the text again CAREFULLY & PRECISELY & CONSISTENTLY, try to understand it CAREFULLY & PRECISELY & CONSISTENTLY , try to think it through CAREFULLY & PRECISELY & CONSISTENTLY and then stick to the points CAREFULLY & PRECISELY & CONSISTENTLY - as far as you can get them - without muddling and mixing up points and shifting and swapping topics and issues in the streams of your swampy unimaginative associations - and without concocting your own nonsense interpretation of biblical texts (in themselves they are problematic enough).
-- signature .
Post a Followup