The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> Re: Lest You Forget

Re: Lest You Forget
Posted by parhad (Guest) - Saturday, August 28 2004, 16:31:36 (CEST)
from - Windows XP - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

Paul Younan wrote:
>parhad wrote:
>>..and you still haven't said what you would do if it was your wife who's life was in danger a week before the baby was due..if she were in a coma and the doctors came to you and said.."Mr Jesus...you wouldn't allow your wife to have this emergency procedure last week when we told you it was necessary...because you said you did not want a frivilous demon unleashed on the world...the result is that she just slipped into a coma today, a week after your principles wouldn't allow us to terminate the pregancy by gleefully plucking apart your baby while a Tom Tom played and we wore grass skirts..well Mr Jesus...we have 24 hours to get the living, breathing, cute, nubby little baby boy out of her you were FINALLY going to get out of her...yes Mr Jesus...it comes down to little Pauley and what Jesus wants..or your wife's life...which is it going to be...do we cut up and crush the skull and extract the eyeballs of your FIRST son so your wife can live, if we are in time...and so your daughters can have their mother...or do we let the mother of your daughters die"
>>
>>This is the third time I've asked you a very "simple" and direct question...why won't you answer?
>
>I already answered you in a different post, but allow me to repeat myself to the tenth time: I feel that we have an obligation to save the mother's life, especially since the child will die with the mother anyway. If you can save both, great. If you can save one, it has to be the mother.

...that's what the procedure you ighlighted whenwe started this nonsense is intended for...and NOT "for any reason EFFECTIVELY". You mixed two separate issues together deliberately to confuse. I gather then that you would want your son, your FIRST son, little Pauley, plucked apart...his pretty head, so like your own, crushed and removed bit by bit..then his little arms, that will never hug you or his sisters, broken, the fingers removed one by one,,,his chest, where his tender little heart is beating AT THAT moment and could, if not cruelly murdered by YOUR doctors, live to beat and feel and love and hope except that you SELFISHLY cose your wife over LIFE so you could do "that" again...you sex maniac!!!. Anyone can play a fool's game.
>
>But again, you are talking about 3% of the time - according to statistics from Planned Parenthood. What about the other 97%?

...the photo you flashed on here to impress us with is taken FROM those 3% of cases..which we only found out NOW..you also agree with...after wasting many a kleenex weeping down our necks.

...The rest of abortions are none of your fucking business..or your god's...people JUST as moral as you but without your blinkers on..decided that aborions happen anyway.and to assume they won't when you make SAFE ones illegal..only means that women will DIE. Since YOU decided that your wife is worth saving when at death's door...we realize that SOME women's health issues matter enough to you...that is still YOU deciding..a women can decide for herslef anything about her oWN body and so long as a fetus isdependant on HER body for life itself...then SHE comes first...but I am SHOCKED that at a time when the baby could live and breathe on its own, if only YOU would let it..you would instead murder and cut up your OWN baby...I didn't know that about you till now.

Answer another direct question before the novelty wears off...should either one of your dear daughters find herself in a positon where she is pregnant and does not want the child for ANY reason..and also refuses your request to have the child and give it up for adopton but INSISTS, through those perversities in Life that sometimes lead a child to act differently than a parent, that she wants an abortion...for the SLIGHTEST reason..would you prefer that she have it in a legal and clean setting perfomed by the BEST that medical science has to offer..or for the sake of your conscience, again..would you prefer she goes to a motel in skid row where some quack spreads her legs and does it on a table with a coat hangar...for THAT is the reality women confront..not you baby...NOT you.

So...you want legal and safer abortions available for people's daughters..your's included..or not? And don't tell me she COULD go for adoption..we all know that and STILL women..and maybe your daughter, opt for abortions.

It's a simple question.
>
>I answere your question, now answer mine: Would you support a law which allows abortions in only those cases where the life of the mother is in danger?

...the simple answer is...No...the operative word being "only"...which ONLY you introduce who again, has no business sticking your nose in any other woman's vagina.

..it is not for your god to determine what women can do...especially those who never heard of him and don't want to...it's YOUR morality but THEIR bodies..when you get pregnant..we'll talk.
>
>-Paul



---------------------


The full topic:



Content-length: 5423
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, */*
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en-us
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?Re_Lest_You_Forget-9Dbx.INdp.REPLY
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9