Re: do not read if you find clinical talk of sexuality vulgar |
Posted by
Paul Younan
(Guest)
- Thursday, September 9 2004, 23:46:55 (CEST) from Commercial - Windows XP - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
Shushhh, By all means, let's keep talking about this. An anus is not meant to be penetrated, would you agree? Women licking each others' clitoris' isn't natural, either. A vagina wasn't designed or meant to be "licked" - sure, it feels great....and I'm sure some people like Farid like the idea of a tight anal penetration. But the act of sex is much more than simple pleasure or bonding, wouldn't you agree? Wouldn't you agree that the primary purpose of sex in humans, like sex in animals, is to create offspring? Wouldn't that make homosexual activity useless and unnatural EXCEPT for people looking to simply bust a nut? -Paul --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 957 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, applicatio... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Cache-control: max-age=259200 Connection: keep-alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Pragma: no-cache Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?do_not_read_if_you_find_clinical_talk_of_sexuality_vulgar-29DP.45Fw.R... User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Via: 1.1 proxy1.allantgroup.com:3128 (squid/2.5.STABLE6) X-forwarded-for: 172.16.3.148 |