The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> Re: Ken Crusader

Re: Ken Crusader
Posted by Tiglath (Guest) - Tuesday, May 31 2005, 4:45:45 (CEST)
from 203.58.120.11 - ip11.ip120.ip58.ip203.sensis.com.au Australia - Windows XP - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

hello david,

hope all is well. i actually sent this response to the
pastor a few moments ago. i just received your reply,
and felt maybe my response to him will further clarify
my previous email. hope it helps clarifying what i
meant in further detail. if it doesn't, please feel
free to reply and let me know what you may have
questions about as far am my viewpoints on open
debates. Thanks!!!

Regards,

Christine

hello pastor,

actually, it's christine...:) you are referring to my
friend michelle who gave u the keys in nyc while i was
in china. no worries...:)

i totally agree with you. we all have the right to
disagree, and hear each other out. however, i think
it's all about the tone, delivery, and underlying
meaning of an argument which is something we need to
consider in an open debate. i feel what makes us
unique is our different beliefs, ideals, and
experiences which we can bring to the table. when
someone argues for the sake of putting the other down,
mocking them, and making an argument personal, that's
when it's time to end all discussions with such
individual or group of individuals.

………..I’m glad you agree with me that Ken was wrong for not only taking the Koran out of context but for thinking that we’re ignorant enough to believe that infidels refers to Christians. However I don’t think we should ban him despite his extremist views. Let’s welcome him and use fact to prove that his views are in fact wrong and quite frankly dangerous given the current climate within Iraq.


so, i just feel
you are being very open-minded to a person who just
doesn't want to be hear another viewpoint. i actually
think it's great to bring up "negative" points in the
Bible and our history. nothing in life comes easy, and
nothing should be sugar-coated. i just feel there has
to be a positive motive to shed light on issues, no
matter how horrible they may be. if the only motive of
such an individual is to mock the other person or make
alot of noise with no substance nor goal at hand, it's
so counter-productive.

…….I will not give you answers I will give you only questions. Such as who stands to gain from Assyrian support for the American invaders/occupiers? What are the reasons for the US to stay in Iraq now that they have “liberated” it? Could the fuelling of a civil war be the excuse the Americans use for not leaving Iraq? Are the Iraqis the ones really blowing up the Shiite mosques and our Assyrian churches or could this be a CIA supported ploy to maintain support for the occupation? So many questions not enough enquirers.



---------------------


The full topic:



Content-length: 3104
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, applicatio...
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en-au
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Novinet: v1.2
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf3/rkvsf_core.php?Re_Ken_Crusader-14jy.EVex.REPLY
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9