The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> N. Korea-Means to an End

Posted by Maggie (Guest) - Thursday, October 19 2006, 21:17:29 (CEST)
from 70.135.118.249 - 70.135.118.249 -

Windows XP -

Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

President Bush said Wednesday the United States would stop North Korea from transferring nuclear weapons to Iran or al-Qaida and that the communist regime would then face "a grave consequence."

****OOOOOOOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, a GRAVE CONSEQUENCE! Same words he used to topple Saddam but he is not toppling Kim Jong Il. I wonder why?
What is the difference between one U.S. installed dictator in South Korea and Kim Jong Il in North Korea? In fact, what is the difference between South and North Korea? I have visited both countries and couldn’t wait to get the hell out South Korea from the moment I arrived. In fact, South Korea is the most obnoxious country I have ever visited, with the meanest, harshest, most aggressive, and Stalinist people I have had the displeasure of meeting. I felt like I was in East Berlin or Russia during the cold war. The only difference I noticed between the two people is the following:

North Korea-A devastatingly poor nation, independent of U.S. military bases, with friendly and humble people, working hard to sustain themselves in spite of the harsh treatment the rest of the world has blown them.

South Korea-Completely Americanized, full of American goods and services, full of American military bases, ugly and down right mean and aggressive people ready to soak you for the last dollar they can get from you. Just like Washington, Seoul is full of Neo-Cons.

Bush refused to spell out how the United States would retaliate. "They'd be held to account," the president said in an ABC News interview.
In light of North Korea's Oct. 9 test detonation of a nuclear bomb, Bush warned that any transfer of nuclear material elsewhere in the world by the North would be considered a grave threat to the security of the United States. He previously used "grave threat" in relation to Saddam Hussein, whose government was toppled in the U.S.-led war in 2003.
"If we get intelligence that they're about to transfer a nuclear weapon, we would stop the transfer, and we would deal with the ships that were taking the — or the airplane that was dealing with taking the material to somebody," the president said.
Asked how he would retaliate, Bush would not be specific, "You know, I'd just say it's a grave consequence."

***Such a vast vocabulary, Mr. Bush!

"The leader of North Korea to understand that he'll be held to account. Just like he's being held to account now for having run a test," Bush said.

***Unfortunately Americans will believe your deceitful words just the way they believe WWF is real. You will impose sanctions on N. America just the way you did on Iraq and will starve millions of North Korean children to death, and later bomb them the way you did in Iraq.

The United States repeatedly has said it does not intend to attack the North. But the Bush administration also has refused to take any military option completely off the table.

Shifting to Iraq, Bush said intensifying violence now might be compared with the Tet offensive in Vietnam beginning in 1968. The Viet Cong and North Vietnamese armies undertook a series of attacks that shook America's confidence about winning the war and eroded political support for President Johnson.

***Good of you to finally admit this Mr. Bush! But then again, how can you deny it when you are now exactly in the same position as Johnson was during Vietnam?

"There's certainly a stepped up level of violence, and we're heading into an election," Bush said. But he added, "My gut tells me that they have all along been trying to inflict enough damage that we'd leave. And the leaders of al-Qaida have made that very clear."

***Bingo! So why aren’t you leaving? Oh you haven't milked it to death yet?

Bush said al-Qaida was very active in Iraq. "They are dangerous. They are lethal. They are trying to not only kill American troops, but they're trying to foment sectarian violence.

***Al Qaida was NOT in Iraq when Saddam was president, but now it is because YOU, Mr. Bush, as good as put it there.

"They believe that if they can create enough chaos, the American people will grow sick and tired of the Iraqi effort and will cause government to withdraw," he said.

***Wasn’t it your plan to create a lot of chaos in Iraq all along? What is the difference between you doing it or Al Qaida doing it?

The military said Wednesday that 11 U.S. troops died in combat amid a security crackdown in Baghdad, putting October on track to be the deadliest month for American forces since the siege of Fallujah nearly two years ago.

Bush said the news of casualties "breaks my heart" but said it is surrender "if you pull the troops out before the “job” is done."

***What “JOB”??? Oh you mean to install an American puppet-government, to privatize all the oil refineries for your disposal, install U.S. military bases in Iraq to expand U.S. hegemony over the world, and build a Kurdistan on the Assyrian homeland?

Don’t worry, Mr. bush. Everything you are doing now in Iraq will be undone someday. The Kurd’s time is coming, when the so-called Kurdistan will be the next Israel, a rogue state surrounded by hostile enemies. You are just planting the seeds of future wars for your masters.

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:
No replies.

Content-length: 5842
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio...
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en-us
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf4/rkvsf_core.php?.9BVf.
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; sbcydsl 3.12; YPC 3.2.0; FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; yplus 5.1...