Re: Eichman... |
Posted by
pancho
(Guest)
- Tuesday, December 27 2005, 1:14:45 (CET) from 201.137.242.151 - dsl-201-137-242-151.prod-infinitum.com.mx Mexico - Windows XP - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
> >This is all new to me. I guess I should buy a book on post-WW2 history. ...Iīd recomend, "The Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich"...damn me...I forgot the authorīs name! It will come to me...He was there in Germany during most of that time and his first hand account plus the historical background, incluiding the tril at Nuremberg makes great reading. My main question is: How could Israel abduct a man against international law and try him in court, and then murder him? ...same way we did with Noreiega...only we atacked his country and kidnapped him...we havenīt executed him but he rots in a Florida jail...and just because he was going to spill the beans about Bush senior when he was head of CIA and they used profits from their cocaine trade to finacne little wars here and there. He was naother of our thugs who went "rogue"...meaning he would no longer do as he was told. > >Granted, he was a terrible Nazi and all that...but are exceptions to be made in International law because of terrible people? ...apparently. But Isarel has clearance from the United States to do whatever the United States wants done, in return they get a litle action of their own. Someone should try the US soldiers who murdered Native Americans...someone should try those who starved a half million children to death...the Nazis killed one and a half million...the United States only managed to kill a third that many...beter luck next time. > >I guess I'm just surprised that they rejected his "just following orders" defence but they use those same arguments when Israeli soldiers kill innocent Palestinian civilians...do they not? ...actually the conclusion of the Nuremberg trial was a great moment...the court declared that there was NO defense for crimes aginst humanity...that Humanity and God and conscinece demanded that you refuse such orders because they are ILLEGAL. It would have been wonderful if the United States had agreed to uphold that hard-won and costly decision. > >It's odd...it's almost as if we are encouraged to forget history. Very eerie... ...we are inded encouraged...Iīve decided that America decided to starve schools but raise the pay and number of Police and prison guards...weīll build stel walls around us and shoot to kill...but we wonīt ask ourselves why itīs come to this...and we will lose...there is no such thing as material security...not the Great Wall of China not the Maginot Line...not misle defense...nothing...nothing can make you safe against your OWN folly...lock the world out if you can...but you only lock yourself IN with yourself...your enemy will be within the gates...as fast as you build them. > >********************************** --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 3061 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: es-mx Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf4/rkvsf_core.php?Eichman-EMPe.zP5T.QUOTE User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) |