The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> defined by sexual preference....

Posted by dr pancho (Guest) - Monday, April 24 2006, 20:34:14 (CEST)
from 24.176.174.207 - 24-176-174-207.dhcp.atsc.ca.charter.com

Commercial -

Windows XP -

Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

...I sort of disagree that,at least for now and the near distant future, we should not label people by their sexual orientation. I think first of all that it's heterosexuals who define THEMSELVES by their sexual orientation...as in they can't tell you enough how NORMAL they are...that THEY are the standard of measurement. They are the ones to define people who are different as deviant...abnormal, sick, unnatural. They are the ones flouting their sexuality in car ads and on teevee and in the movies and culture...on top of that THEY are also the ones to define others exclusively as sexual deviants first...and maybe worthy of the vote or a job next, if they keep quiet about who they are and let the heteros go on hogging the spotlight...thus reinforcing their negative message to millions of young Queers not yet born.

I'm afraid that until they change...Queers had better NOT change...had better keep in the face of straight culture. Let straight people slam the closet door shut again, if they dare...but let not Queers ever shut themselves up again.

Which brings us to the next election...no doubt Rove is figuring out how to create straw dogs and red herrings for the dismal Repubs to use in their campaigns...the repubs had it all their way..as much as you can in America without an out and out dictatorship..and they have no one to blame but themselves....there isn't much good news they can run on...so undoubtedly Rove is figuring out how to make an "attack" on marriage and Jesus materialize...and if anyone can do it, he can. These guys are great at campaigning..at winning on imagery and sound bytes...but they govern terribly.

I hope Queers don't shut themselves up thinking they should do nothing to hurt Democrats...just remember that a Democrat is nothing more than a Republican with an ounce more of moral fiber...not enough to hinge something as important as individual liberty on...if Queers must lose ground, let them at least not betray themselves...better to get beaten rather than beat up on yourself.

So, let's make it as rough on Republicans as we can...let Queers INSIST on Gay Marriage...and on every other issue they can think of that will play INTO Republican hands...let the nation vote "morality" one more time...let them go to the dogs in hell all on their own...give them the rope they need to hang themselves...don't pull any Queer punches...nothing will educate people more than giving them what they want...and having them see it destroy their lives even more...by all means...bring ON ARMAGEDDON!!!!

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:

defined by sexual preference.... dr pancho - Monday, April 24 2006, 20:34:14 (CEST)
- Queer Vs. Gay Emil - 04/26 20:32

Content-length: 2846
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: ++++++++++++++
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio...
Accept-language: en-us
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf4/rkvsf_core.php?.4BXw.
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)