The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> just too precious...

Posted by beezelbub (Guest) - Saturday, August 27 2005, 2:10:38 (CEST)
from 71.116.105.46 - pool-71-116-105-46.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net

Network -

Mac OS -

Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

...I haven't the time to explore this dasinating glimpse into what these biys call strategy...what they were hoping to gain and HOW...just want to plant it here for now...

Re: Theocracy and Democracy in one Constitution? What a Farce!

Posted By: FYI (CPE000ae6c87245-CM000a73a1868a.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
Date: Friday, 26 August 2005, at 5:28 p.m.

In Response To: Theocracy and Democracy in one Constitution? What a Farce! (Fil)

Aziza Fil,

We knew this all along, the idea was this; all we wanted was first to legitimize our existence “The Assyrian Identity” , and get our selves and our rights legitimacy from the “State of Iraq”, all we needed is the clear recognition in the Constitution a nation called Assyrian. Once we got that we would have taken our case to the UN based on the legitimacy that we got from the Iraqi state constitution , this would have been all based on legality based on Iraq’s constitution and on the ground that Iraq is a member in the UN, as the Un would endorse the Iraqi constitution.

The Assyrian existence and its recognition in the Iraqi constitution as an ethnic identity, is our ticket, a direct claim to Iraq’s “Historical and geographical facts“, an automatic case for indigenous stats, because simply no any other ethnics of Iraq in present day and what would have been in the constitution can claim that only the “Assyrians” on a ground that ; Iraq is made of Arabs, Kurds, Turkmans, Assyrians and all others whatever names for the rest, Iraq’s historical and civilization facts are; Sumarians, Akkadian, Babylonians and Assyrians, you see the word ASSYRIAN? Arabs are not calling themselves Sumerians in the constitution neither Kurds and Turkmans, the case would have been that the constitution is recognizing the Assyrians and the word Assyrian a continuation of Assyria and Assyrians its inhabitant, historical and geographical facts and realities.

We basically cant take or do anything with the UN with our case, if we don’t have it legitimized within Iraqi LAWS and the state of Iraq constitution.

All along we have been saying the word Assyrian is not a name, it is an identity, it is the rights its self, “Land, indigenous and the rest to follow”.

We wouldn’t care less if Iraq would be an Islamic or a democratic, because by its laws we would have secured our rights and needs as a nation in Iraq.

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:

just too precious... beezelbub - Saturday, August 27 2005, 2:10:38 (CEST)
- Re: just too precious... beezelbub - 08/28 01:44

Content-length: 2809
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: */*
Accept-language: en
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Extension: Security/Remote-Passphrase
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf4/rkvsf_core.php?.Zmnv.
Ua-cpu: PPC
Ua-os: MacOS
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Mac_PowerPC)