The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> keep digging...

Posted by beezelbub (Guest) - Thursday, November 3 2005, 0:54:14 (CET)
from 71.116.90.200 - pool-71-116-90-200.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net

Network -

Mac OS -

Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

As an answer to: Another admittion by bubba... written by GS on 02 Nov 2005 19:27:45:

Posted by beezelbub (Guest) - Wednesday, November 2 2005, 15:33:16 (CET)

Bubba wrote:

“,,,now that you're filled to bursting and feeling brave again cause you got your address off the internet...let's see you answer a simple question or two...and answer with some honesty...

1. Why has it not been significant to mention that a Republican Congress voted to censure DeLay? What does that say about his crookedness?...”

(huffing) Bubba Delay was not censured by the Republican congress unless you are confusing it with him giving up his post?

...yes he was censured. This is your style...you just keep lying...thinking because you say something is true, it must be..or people will trust you...silly fools!

...I posted and article about the impeachment of Clinton,,,I exerpted a quote which clearly said he was aquitted on all charges...i also said republicans broke rank and voted to aquit him...you are still ignoring that...of course. Your breezu replies, born of the emptiness in your had...satisfy you...so that's all you need do.

..DeLay was CENSURED by a Republican dominated Congress...i can go find an article saying exactly that...Like I did abvout Clinton being found NOT guilty..and you'll simply ignore it and tell us..."hehe, bubba...DeLay was not censured".

...the people you fool can have you...I'm not interested in them...I'm not interested in you either, except to blow holes through you...so you can be even breezier.

There is a Republican rule that states if anyone is under indictment in the Republican House and he holds a position of whip or speaker…he is to step down from that post until the indictments are cleared. Notice only the Republicans have that rule. The Demoncrats do not. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

..The Republicans only have that rule because they were too embarrassed to change it...as they thought to do in order to save that skunk...that would have been pretty...and they do have that rule and always did...that's the rule that was used to remove a democrat from that position...he was from Illinois...don't remember his name...

..besides which, we aren't talking about his stepping down because of an indictment brought by a GRAND JURY...in TEXAS...we're talking about the CENSURE voted by a Republican dominated Congress...something you keep trying to side-step...go ahead...the whole point is to get you to unravel...dance away.

Bubba wrote:

“…2. How come, with control of the White House, the House AND the Senate, Republican fortunes are in the toilet?...”

That is what you see. I think we are in good shape. We will see in 06 won’t we?

...yata yata yata...I could give a shit which branch of the Millionaire's Club dominates...that's YOUR game..keeping people distracted with a grair one and a grair two so they THINk there are "two"...there is only ONE party and there is only ONE of you...go play these games with your girlfriend.

Bubba wrote:

Do you give the Dems THAT much credit that with everything sewn up in your pants pocket you people STILL manage to shoot yourselves in the foot and get "attacked" by Liberals...can you people NEVER defend yourselves???...”

I admit the Republicans can defends themselves much better.

...sure they can...that's the reason with ALL the government and media in their hands old George is sinking faster than a turd.

They do need more balls but if that is the case then they would be lowering themselves to the tactics of the demoncrats.

...keep it up...thank you.

I loike to use this word to describe it is schadenfreude, which is defined as taking malicious pleasure at the misfortune of others. You guys do it well.

...we know your tricks by now...this is what YOU do...naturally you're going to accuse your oponents of doing it...it's the way you always try to weasel out of things...but, you'll notice you've only lied some more.

1. You still maintain Clinton was found guilty...though you ofer not a single shred of evidence, except a breeze.

2. You've added another lie, that DeLay was NOT censured...when the nation knows he was...whassamattr, your god got caught slumming?

Any more questions…

...sure...how come you don't answer them?

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:

keep digging... beezelbub - Thursday, November 3 2005, 0:54:14 (CET)
- The bastard was censured TWICE!!! beezelbub - 11/03 00:59

Content-length: 4922
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: */*
Accept-language: en
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Extension: Security/Remote-Passphrase
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Pragma: no-cache
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf4/rkvsf_core.php?.1IPf.
Ua-cpu: PPC
Ua-os: MacOS
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.17; Mac_PowerPC)