The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> how many times...

Posted by pancho (Guest) - Friday, July 13 2007, 20:05:15 (CEST)
from 69.235.55.240 - adsl-69-235-55-240.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net

Network -

Mac OS X -

Safari
Website:
Website title:

...was Maggie admonished in the very same high toned manner she now uses against those she doesn't approve of? How many times was she told by site administrators and other people that she was flying in the face of "democracy"? How many times was she lectured about her lack of understanding of "free speech"? How many times was she told to "respect others"? How many times was she told that she must stop "insulting" people...or using "bad language"?

And now, because she has her OWN place where HER rules can be applied...she strats sounding off just like them!

They too accused her of merely wanting to "ruin it" for others....they too told her she had no valid ideas to express. just wanted to 'attack and attack" in order to "shut down" other sites.

These people are all the same..and it's a most worthwhile thing to show that they are...because they are using the Iraqi people to advance their own agendas...in Maggie's case it is to showcase herself as a "truly caring champion of her people"...she stands behind them in order to spew her stuff, confident that no one dare challenge her on it...like Bush hiding behind and Jesus and the flag to enrich himself and his cronies...who would DARE attack his front? Maggie had no trouble doing...and I have no trouble doing it, even though she hides behind her "dear people".

A scoundrel will always hide behind something noble-sounding...but that's because he or she IS a scoundrel..not because they are honest.

And you can see, in this bull about her SERVER made her do it...that she's being dishonest. This is siomply a site where HER friends..those who think like her, can feel "safe". It's what all the others have..and they ALL call on freedom and democracy and RESPONSIBILITY to be their guiding light. They all do. And they're all lying.

The very essence of free speech escapes them..that it is UNPOPULAR speech that needs protecting...not the speech of your pals, who all agree with you.

Unpopular poetry MUST exist or there is no freedom, no democracy...just Maggie.

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:
No replies.

Content-length: 2387
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: */*
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?.1Utw.
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/419 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3