The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> no evidence?

no evidence?
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Monday, April 18 2011, 12:52:38 (UTC)
from *** - *** - Windows NT - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

...what about the fact that all the officials who first responded to the scene of the Pentagon crash, or the field in Pennsylvania, two places where jet liners filled with passengers also crashed, not a single one of them said he found the remains of a seat a tray, an engine, luggage, clothing....or any ID? These were cops and firemen and medics, not wild-eyed Lefties.

...what about scenes of other plane crashes which all showed a massive debris field...even where there had been fires?

...where is the EVIDENCE that passenger planes crashed at those sites...and I donīt mean news broadcasts that they did, or government pronouncements...I mean actual evidence? Cause if there was any, it would have been flashed on screens all across the country.

... and what if this was also part controlled-experiment, to see how far you can go in lying to people in subjects they do NOT want to know the truth about? Like the missing WMDs? Wasnīt it a little strange that Bush didnīt even try to plant a few WMDs in Iraq, just to shore up his credibility? But maybe not, maybe that too was an experiment to see how far you can go in blatantly lying and still not being held accountable...and thatīs excatly what happened....we went to war based on lies and no one cared...that is a great discovery for the future...a great victory for Fascism, which is on the march and has been for decades...with much better media control these days.


And was THAT too an accident..or of no importance? Anyone remember when bills were introduced allowing what had never been allowed before? You could never before own all media outlets in any one market area...the same person or corporation could not own teevee, radio and print outlets in one area...and are we to believe that changing that important protection was merely "good business"? Well it was, but not the usual kinds of buisness..not to make money, at least not just yet and not in the usual way. Those laws were changed to allow corporations to own information...and no one cared.

If I had warned Chomskey at the time he would have said I was paranoid, that the government had nothing to do with it, that it was just a business decision, made with an eye to profit, or efficiency.

Well, in part it was. But it was mostly done in order to shape "news", to own every outlet so that your message and only your message would be heard and seen and read.

but who cares....right?



---------------------


The full topic:



***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9