The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> who is more dangerous?

who is more dangerous?
Posted by Rashad (Guest) - Monday, February 6 2012, 7:01:16 (UTC)
from 74.136.41.187 - 74-136-41-187.dhcp.insightbb.com Commercial - Windows Codename Longhorn - Mozilla
Website:
Website title:

When you compare Muslims and Christians, most people will see the former as more dangerous as the latter and more violent, but how true is it? How many world wars, genocides etc has Islam brought to the world. America has a young history and has been at war ever since. It"s averaging a war every five years right now and this is a Christian country and new. Christians have gone thousands of miles away from their homes to exploit, murder, occupy people who have done nothing to them. Muslims have not brought world wars, committed genocides or mass murdered millions of innocent people. I always hear about how dangerous this world would be if Muslims had power or nuclear weapons, and such people are either ignorant of history or simply prejudice. There was a time when Muslims had power and ruled over three continents for centuries. If they were so dangerous, they would have killed most people that were conquered but they didn't. America has dropped atomic bombs and used chemical weapons on people yet they tell us how dangerous Muslims are. Hitler was a Christian and used poison/gas on the French and Christians make those weapons. Muslims have never even had the interests to make such weapons nor have the desire to buy them.

If anybody should be feared, it's Christians with such weapons and they are the real danger to everyone. Muslims have been in their own countries for over a century without attacking anyone, yet the Middle East is full of Christian military bases and the region is at war and unstable because of Christians. How can anyone not see the real danger and how does that not scare Sam Harris or the other who suffer from such phobia? They say the reason Muslims with nuclear weapons are more dangerous is because they would actually use them, but how would they know that? We know Christians and white people have them and have used them so why is that not feared? How can they know Muslims will use them when they have no evidence for that. When Muslims had power to truly hurt mass populations, they didn't do it and ran a global civilization with various cultures, religions, and peoples living within the empire. There were banks, libraries, schools, education, love, security, prosperity, etc. I can say that the lives of Jews and Christians did not become in danger during the many centuries in Spain or the Ottoman empire or the Arabs in Mesopotamia. But what about Christians and what they do?

What happened to the people of the Americas when Christians arrived or what happened to the indigenous people of Australia, New Zealand, Philippines, etc? Mass numbers of people vanished because of these white men who were Christians, yet we are told to watch out for Muslims who are in their own countries and doing what any human would do when oppressed. Who would wanna live under oppression and how stupid do Christians think Middle East people are. This is a region which has thousands of years of history and various peoples have coexisted for many centuries, yet they need Christians from the west to teach them and help them. The same people who wipe their arse with paper are suppose to teach descendants of cultured people how to live and be free?

I don't see Muslims as the real danger to our lives but Christians and they have all the guns and the biggest ones. Arabs maybe the dark men with machine guns and big dicks while white people are portrayed as clean shaved people who wear suits and are innocent but it's far from that. This is the reason I don't really attack Muslims too much as they don't bother me nor do I see them as dangerous. I can clown on them all day for believing in nonsense but I don't as long they don't harm anyone or bother people. It's Christians who go far away to "preach' the gospels and those harmless looking men are often followed by military men from their countries and get their paychecks from their governments. Muslims haven't sent missionaries to Alaska and Brazil to convert people nor do they condemn people to hell or tell anyone that they are "saved." In my opinion, a religion like Christianity, which believes in being "saved," is more dangerous than a religion like Islam, which has no such thing. There is no lamb of god, swim in my blood, eat me, drink me, blood sacrifice, original sin, etc. In Christianity, one is already born for hell whereas there is no such idea in Islam.

It becomes necessary to compare the two because we always hear about Muslims but Christians get a free pass. I will not allow it and I will mention both sides. Islam and Christianity are both religions, and no doubt about that, but they are different and have unique histories from the start. Christianity may be the "religion of peace" but it sure hasn't been in the 2,000 years of history. If we take all the things done by Christians and all the things done by Muslims, which side of the scale will be heavier, and there are far more "bad" Christians than there are bad Muslims. If Christianity is the religion of peace, then it has failed and produced far more of the opposite. I will use the Jesus test against himself. He supposedly said; by the fruit you will know a tree. Let's see the Christian tree and how bad it is. Jesus is supposed to be a good tree, yet many of his followers have been "bad fruit" and then there is Muhammad who is a bad tree according to Christians and anyone who don't like Muslims, yet most of his followers have been decent in history. And I mean history and not the "books" written by village priests and those silly copts.

I think it is clear who is more scary and dangerous between the two and I can't stop repeating myself when I say it's racism. This is what it is unless they can offer a justification for their views and claims. Sam Harris has the nerves to compare Iraqis to Americans and say Muslims are dangerous. He talks about suicide bombers and blames it on Muslims, but fails to mention that the biggest suicide bombers are from Sri Lanka and are not Muslims. There have also been Christian suicide bombers and one of the first ones, if not the first, was a Christian from Lebanon. There have also been Christian suicide bombers among Palestinians and I do recall a Christian female being one. but it is never mentioned.

They want to talk about danger and what Islam will do, and I will show who is actually dangerous and what Christianity has already done, and continues to do. Don't tell me about what would happen which is mere speculation and prejudice but let's hear what has happened and continues to.



---------------------


The full topic:



Host: www.insideassyria.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Connection: close
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?.BENY.
Cookie: *hidded*
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-length: 6987



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9