Re: The Times and Iraq |
Posted by
parhad
(Guest)
- Tuesday, June 1 2004, 7:32:30 (CEST) from 148.233.93.111 - customer-148-233-93-111.uninet-ide.com.mx Mexico - Windows XP - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
was that supposed to be a joke? Who they trying to kid? No one CARES to verify anything...everyone WANTED to believe the worst..it was exciting and fun...so what if people got killed...when has that ever bothered anyone? The Times just feels a little foolish but they`d do it again in a heartbeat. No shit..."we wuz lied to"!!! Why the fuck didn`t they "fall" for the other lies..the ones about there being nothing in Iraq but what the Americans put there? How come some lies were better than others? Or are they just allergic to the truth? --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 796 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: es-mx Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?The_Times_and_Iraq-6ASr.09fp.REPLY User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; MSN 6.1; MSNbMSFT; MSNmes-mx; MSNc00; v5m) |