Re: do not read if you find clinical talk of sexuality vulgar |
Posted by
Shushan
(Guest)
- Thursday, September 9 2004, 23:48:40 (CEST) from - Windows 98 - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
p.s. and if you don't think humans evolved to primarily have vaginal sex from behind... ask your self why men love to look at women's butts and it turns them on. and who knows maybe the simiarity of boob and butt cleavage is not so coincidental since both are turn ons for men. okay sorry to be vulgar but i studied human sexuality and physiology a long time ago in a course in college and it has fascinated me since... but sorry if i got a bit vulgar... i am not usually but you all are a bad influence on me ;) --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 759 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: application/x-shockwave-flash, image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, */* Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf2/rkvsf_core.php?do_not_read_if_you_find_clinical_talk_of_sexuality_vulgar-29DP.19op.R... User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98) |