The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> Jackie Bejan and her Twirling Nuts

Jackie Bejan and her Twirling Nuts
Posted by parhad (Guest) - Friday, October 29 2004, 20:20:23 (CEST)
from 64.161.208.211 - adsl-64-161-208-211.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net Network - Windows 98 - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

...I found this in the archives....it srt of spells it out...basically, hen Jackie found she couldn't do a Nimrod with Shumirum either...meaning hijack it to promote herself...she lashed out privately to people that I was a beggar...that I cheated people...that she SAVED me by GIVING me money and on and on...the kind of stuff we usually do EXCEPT she forgot that I make my living and support my family AS an Assyrians...not an engineer or doctor for whom community gossip don't matter...but some who can be hurt financially by the kinds of jealousy and pettiness we usually toss around without thinking...that pissed me off, especially when she told her friends NOT to buy from and put out that I was going to sue her and how COULD they support such a person etc...so I went on the net and told the truth about her...which meade her furious..I didn't do it behind her back and I sure as hell didn't call her customers and tell them ahe was a cheat and fraud...I just told how she's try to seduce and than whangle me...how she was pissed that none of it worked (have you SEEN her?)...for which she promptly paid a boy-toy lawyer several thousand to sue me for 2 mill...and when she found Jeff had shared her damning and lying emails about me with me...she decided to sue Jeff for 2 million as well....unless he caved in and distanced himself and apologived to her highass....which he refused to do so the two of us bumbled through the courts process against her three lawyers as best we could for over a year until she backed out as we approached a trial date..she simply stopped paying her lawyer or returning his phone calls till he had himself removed form the case and her harrassment lawsuit died the death it deserved....this is one post from ahile back...

Jackie Bejan is sitting on the horns of a dilemna...something she'd enjoy oridnarily but not this one. I think she's going to drop the two million, or was it billion, lawsuit against Jeff and I. It's one thing for the kid who's been molested to bring charges...it's another thing for the priest who did the fucking to sue the kid because the kid talked...or bit the fucker's fucking finger. I know she was furious to think I'd been "ungrateful" enough to refuse her advances in the first place...but then she went balistic when she realized I talked...told people what she'd done and her real motivation in keeping me out of the convention and lying behind my back and seeing land swindles all over the place. There's no way she can rationally explain herself and the jury is going to keep thinking..."woman scorned...woman scroned...woman scorned"

If she goes through with it, I get to put her on the stand and ask her, point-blank, questions she wouldn't address in private, or on a forum...which is somewhat anonymous. These same questions and more are going to be put to her in front of strangers and maybe worse...people who dislike the shit out of her and she's going to have to answer truthfully under pain of perjury and public humiliation. On top of that everything she wanted to suppress is going to be spoken about in the open and become part of the public record, after which she can't control it or punish anyone for re-printing it. The odds of her winning a judgement are going to be slim indeed. It shouldn't be difficult to reveal to the jury just what she is and why she reacted as she did. Chances are there will be more people victimized by just such rich, arrogant, overweening weenies on the jury than rich arrogant weenies...people who know well what it's like to be hounded by those more powerful than they are...people who've also suffered economic set-backs, as I did...people who feel they've been unfairly run over and left to lick their wounds as best they can. There simply is no other credible explanation for what she did except the truth...

As if I needed a better case, she went ahead and sued Jeff and then addmitted through her lawyer he hadn't done anything to her. Well neither did I...baby...neither did I. And that's why I'm here...I refused to do anything to her or with her or for her, under, on top of, or behind her...except sell her sculpture at good prices. What shows the vindictive nature of this bitch better than that? Jeff's incurred legal expenses just responding to this bullshit...as they knew he would. He's already been punished by Jackie and she admits he didn't do anything to her. Nothing except not be pulled in by her act...nothing more than think for himself and respond according to his conscience and not from fear of the bitch...a fear she tried to make palpable and hang over his head unless he played ball with her. This is how she operates. In my case it was a bit extreme...but it's the same tactic...Jackie wants something...you better give it to her or else. This is the stuff our leaders are made from.

Course in her case she "lavishes" her time and attention and expensive presence on us so we overlook how destructive she ultimately is. It's been almost a year since she had to step aside as president of her club and they haven't even been able to find a single candidate willing to step into the president's shoes...because no one wants to follow her act...how could they compete? All the person would get in the way of thanks would be comparisons between Jackie's glorious reign, made so by her manic cash...and what little they were able to achieve...and no one wants to stun people and call that "work for Assyria" the way Jackie needs to. Who wants to be president after Jackie? She killed the club...she didn't lead it anywhere but into her pocket.

She'll present testimonials as to her vast achievemets...but that comes later in the trial...you don't start out telling the jury what a wonderful person you are. Besides, plenty of fuckers have great sounding credentials...but that isn't at issue here. I never took away from her real achievements...we have no argument there. I'm claiming that even a Bishop can want to molest people...I don't care how good he is at Vatican conferences or printing the Vatican newspaper...or making bucks for the pope...that isn't the point. It's nice that a fucker of children writes poetry, I suppose...but it doesn't change the central fact that he's a fucking poet.

She's claiming that I can't discuss her privates the way I did. I think I can, under special circumstances. Under the Law you can get pissed at someone and blurt out some things you ordinarily wouldn't. It's called "sticks and stones" meaning words spoken in anger or anguish are just that...words...and you're allowed to say "ouch" if someone steps on your toes hard and on purpose. Her reputation doesn't count for anything because she doesn't earn her living from being Assyrian. I do. I didn't write to her customers and vendors smearing her to them or expressing my outrage to them for what she'd done to me among the Assyrians, seeking to discourage them from doing business with her so she might go broke and not be able to afford Christmas presents for her children...she did that. She's the one who sent letters and said things to people whose good opinion and trust I had to keep if I hoped to sell further...a community I'd worked 20 years in to establish some trust and confidence towards me. Now I was a "land swindler" and one who begged for food at her door and one you had better not buy sculpture from because he was using that money to sue Assyria with and how could you...?

That leaves her claiming she suffered so she couldn't attend to either her work or her volunteer work. She can say it...but I can ask for definite proof that her company lost business on account of her pooter being on the internet...or that she was forced to cut back on her duties as president of her own fan club. Every time I visited California, there was Jackie leading the cheering section at one Assyrian event after another...so I'm not sure she cut back on anything at all.

They copied 200 posts and submitted them as proof of my nefarious and nasty ways...every reference to a cunt or a pooter, boobs and a big ass...fat thighs and a hairy middle was highlighted. Well, we have to go over each and every one...if they submit them as evidence...and if they were good enugh to justify a lawsuit...why wouldn't we discuss them...one by one. As for the sex come-ons, it's a he-said she-said...and that has to be left up to the jury to decide. By its nature there aren't people around when this sort of hanky panky gets played out. So we have to go into detail about how often she had me at her house alone...what she wore and how she behaved...how she bent over and where I was at the time and what she planned to do with me in Detroit the time she wanted to take me with her. This can be fascinating stuff to go over with a fine toothcomb...for me. I think it will make her and Lincoln squirm and sweat...but that's their choice.

Even if the most unlikely thing happens and she wins some damages. She isn't going to get anything out of me and I don't live in the United States anymore so where will she sue me the next time I spread her all over the place? What's to be gained but more well deserved public humiliation and exposure? She isn't going to "teach" me anything...she isn't going to get any satisfaction except to see these issues re-visited when they'd just about died down.

And what if she drops the charges and we don't go to trial? How can she object if I put all the old posts right back up there? Will she sue me all over again? This time I'll use the SLAP provision that turns the tables on those who merely try to make it expensive for you to exercise your legal rights and protect themselves from their just desserts by throwing lawsuits at you...didn't know about it before. And if she sues me again for charges she just dropped...how much more obvious can it be that she's using the courts as punishment...as her suing Jeff already demonstrates. I'm not taking anything back so if she had a snowball's chance in a pooter of winning a judgement, she'd have stuck to her guns the first time around instead of getting up to the courthouse steps and backing off. What merit would a second lawsuit have in the eyes of the court if it's for exactly the same things the first one was for...and she didn't go through with that?

Ah Jackie, Jackie, Jackie...how could you make such a classic blunder? Next time ask your lawyer what he would do if the panties were on the other pooter. Shawn knows it will only make things worse to sue me for putting his "writings" on the internet. He knows I'm not going to make a lifetime practise of it...that it just comes with this territory and will be gone and done with soon. What occasion will I have in the very near future to even get a letter from Shawn? None...not unless he pulls a Jackie and sues me for it...in which case he does little more than insure that I'll be writing and talking about him and his writings and who knows what else for the two years it will take for his silly thing to go through the courts...and in the end he'll get about as much satisfaction as Jackie will...nada...just make things worse for himself and fun for me.

All Jackie had to do was take her rejection in stride...chastise herself for thinking I'd respond favorably...refrain from trying to PUNISH me for refusing her...and not punish Jeff and then the rest of us by screwing up the Shumirum yet again...and interfering with the Hammurabi project by having me kicked out of the San Jose convention..."Her" convention...and all of it just because I wouldn't play balls. That's all. A little self-control...a little good sense...a look in the mirror and we'd all have been spared. My lawyer's letter to her and Atour "Down Here" Golani merely asked that her club and the AANF honor its committment to me, reaffirmed by Jackie herself and which had been in effect now for 23 years and allow me to display the sculptures I'd made...as they asked me to...as Jackie and Atour knew I was going to...and I would have gone away. I did nothing "bad" at the convention, I caused no trouble, on the contrary the security chief thanked me personally for calming a particular situation that could have become tragic...I embarrassed no one...on the contrary I had attractive sculptures to show the people...and I wore a tie.

One other outcome of a trial will be that Jackie will lay the whole thing at Atour's tiny feet...as she already has. She'll testify that the whole thing was his idea...that she was "merely" a local little guy and he was the big bad president. But I don't think it's going to come to trial. I don't know how she gets out of it and saves any face. Maybe she'll say she's "too busy" to waste time with "ten year olds"...but I don't know...she sure seemed eager enough to spend a little private time with THIS ten year old back when.

In February the judge will set a court date. He said neither Jeff nor I would have to be there for that hearing...just send in the dates we'd be available. I imagine a trial will come sometime this summer...early part of it. I recommend getting there early if you want seats. there are all sorts of ways to make history...wait till you see who I subpenis as witnesses...so get there early...because "Hell hath no fury"... like a man shat upon because he wouldn't squat upon a woman.



---------------------


The full topic:



Content-length: 14045
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, */*
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en-us
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf3/rkvsf_core.php?.5MWt.
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9