Re: Could somebody put a NUMBER of slaughter to be a GENOCIDE! |
Posted by
pancho
(Guest)
- Tuesday, December 25 2007, 6:32:34 (CET) from 71.116.101.196 - pool-71-116-101-196.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net Network - Windows XP - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
Jumblat wrote: >Kindly, could somebody put the number of people to be killed to name that a genocide ? is that 100 , 1000, 100,000 or MORE ! > >Thank you in advance ! ..it isn't the number. Look the damn word up in a dictionary for a change and stop getting your English words from Syriac manuscripts! It's important to understand the subtle shades of meaning in ENGLISH! For instance, if Jumblat fell into the ocean and was in danger of drowning, that would be "tragic"....if some one pulled him out, it would be "catastrophic". --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 867 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, */* Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Could_somebody_put_a_NUMBER_of_slaughter_to_be_a_GENOCIDE-02Xy.1SXg.Q... User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) |