Re: Could somebody put a NUMBER of slaughter to be a GENOCIDE! |
Posted by
Jumblat
(Guest)
- Tuesday, December 25 2007, 7:36:04 (CET) from 69.219.144.116 - ppp-69-219-144-116.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net Network - Windows XP - Internet Explorer Website: Website title: |
Panch wrote : " For instance, if Jumblat fell into the ocean and was in danger of drowning, that would be "tragic"....if some one pulled him out, it would be "catastrophic". REPLY >>> Do you mean you got that STUPID STATEMENT from the English dictionary ? then it is TRAGIC oops Catastrophe ! --------------------- |
The full topic:
|
Content-length: 600 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio... Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-language: en-us Cache-control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Cookie: *hidded* Host: www.insideassyria.com Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?Re_Could_somebody_put_a_NUMBER_of_slaughter_to_be_a_GENOCIDE-68BK.EIg... Ua-cpu: x86 User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) |