The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: If you wish, here is why

Posted by Jeffrey (Guest) - Sunday, April 6 2008, 16:52:00 (CEST)
from 69.14.30.71 - d14-69-71-30.try.wideopenwest.com

Commercial -

Windows XP -

Mozilla
Website:
Website title:

Hey buddy:

Just wanted you to know I found the site that you copied and pasted these definitions from...

http://home.att.net/~tangents/issue/think/fallacy.htm

Enjoy!

:-)

- Jeffrey

_____________
MiniMe wrote:
>There is hardly anyone in the world who is as stupid as you are... Why? Because of the never ending fallacies you spew and claim to be the "truth"...
>
>Read and pay attention, IDIOT. here are a few, with definitions, based on science... Of Course...
>
>
>1- begging the question (petitio principii): A.k.a. "circular argument," uses some form of its own conclusion as one of its key premises.
>
>2-biased sample: Uses a skewed sample of individuals to draw conclusions about an entire group.
>
>2-complex question: Asks a question with an unjustified presupposition.
>
>3-confusion of cause and effect: Assumes that one thing causes another, when in fact what is assumed to be the cause may be the effect, and vice-versa.
>
>4-false (questionable) cause: Assigns a particular cause to an event, despite reason to consider other possible causes.
>
>false dilemma: Sets unrealistic limits on possible options.
>
>5-genetic fallacy: Infers that information must be false if the reputation of its source is questionable.
>
>6-guilt by association: Implies that an idea is bad if it is associated with harmful ideas or practices.
>
>7-hasty generalization: Makes an unjustified general inference from an insufficient sample.
>
>8-spotlight: Infers that highly conspicuous individuals are typical of a group.
>
>9-undistributed middle: Makes an unjustified inference about some members of a group from information about some other members of the group.
>
>10-unqualified generalization (dicto simpliciter): Makes an assumption about all individuals in a group, overlooking pertinent differences.
>
>11-composition: Ascribes the nature of one or more parts to the whole.
>
>12- Monkeyism: Believing that when one does not disclose answers, has none...
>
>
>So stupid monkey, as you see from the above fallacy syndrom unique to you... Based on SCIENTIFIC FACTS. You actually are an idiot. So as I suggested to you from the beggining, go and see a psychiatrist... Afterward, go home and screw yourself.

---------------------

- BACK TO INDEX - REPLY - QUOTE - EDIT - DELETE -

The full topic:

calling me an idiot.... pancho - Friday, April 4 2008, 16:01:25 (CEST)
- If you wish, here is why MiniMe - 04/06 11:24
  - Re: If you wish, here is why Jeffrey - 04/06 16:52
    - Re: If you wish, here is why MiniMe - 04/07 06:36
      - see what I mean? pancho - 04/07 17:06
        Re: see what I mean? MiniMe - 04/07 22:33
        Re: see what I mean? pancho - 04/08 17:21
  - Re: If you wish, here is why pancho - 04/06 18:56
    - could you be more predictable? pancho - 04/08 01:30

Content-length: 2826
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5
Accept-charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Accept-encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Keep-alive: 300
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?If_you_wish_here_is_why-8RUg.3Cnq.QUOTE
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13