The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: can't figure Hitchens....

Re: can't figure Hitchens....
Posted by Rashad (Guest) - Friday, June 15 2012, 7:31:02 (UTC)
from 74.82.64.33 - 74-82-64-33.rdns.blackberry.net Network - -
Website:
Website title:

I try to listen to George Galloway's radio show whenever I can and just to see what some of the callers say. I been hearing more and more call regarding Iran and nuclear weapons. It's the Iraq lie all over again and these dumb Brits have bought it again. Sometimes the idiots sound so identical that you start to think it's the same person calling all the time or that maybe Galloway is paying these people to act so silly. One caller called and said USA and or Israel must react first and Iran with nukes is too dangerous to allow. George asked him how so and reminded him of the aftermath and how Iran would strike back at whoever attacks. The caller says that's why they dangerous and need to be taken out. He says intelligence already know where the plants are, but didn't they say that in Iraq as well, and it wasn't that long ago, right? So then the caller was reminded that it was US that has used atomic bombs and other dirty weapons and Iran has attacked nobody in centuries.

Like and propagandist, the caller persisted with it and just felt Iran is more dangerous with such weapons but he couldn't explain why or how that is. Where is the evidence for such? Israel has promised to use them before and still does, why no concern? USA has dropped bombs on people and is always at war, why no concern? Is it only a fear against Muslims? This comes from ignorance and it's no doubt racist. Judaism is apparently more trusted and closer to the west than Islam is even though all those silly faiths started in same region and are more or less similar. We have seen what British have done and are doing, we have seen America and we are still seeing it, but we haven't seen such from Muslims. When Muslims had such powers to just wipe out people, exploit, etc, they didn't do it.
Nobody could have stopped the Ottomans nor the Arab caliphs from putting people to the sword but they didn't even when they had the power and time to do it. Was 800 years of Turkish rule not enough or the centuries of Arab rule in Spain, Egypt and elsewhere? Why is it so dangerous for Muslims to have nuclear power but not for anyone else? Israel has them, India has them and many other countries have them. The only Muslims to have them is Pakistan and that's only because of India and the west that helped them. Muslims haven't had the desires for them but when country after country is being bombed, harassed and humiliated, then perhaps the need for such weapons will come. We saw what happened to Iraq, Libya, Syria currently and many other countries. It is only because of America that Iran even needs nukes and they still don't really want them, but only seek to pursue nuclear energy. This is a right and not illegal, hell nuclear weapons are obviously not illegal since many countries have them. Let all countries get them and this will stop invasions and these bogus wars of modern times.



---------------------


The full topic:



Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Content-length: 3186
User-agent: BlackBerry8530/5.0.0.654 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/389
Accept-language: en-US,en;q=0.5
X-wap-profile: "http://www.blackberry.net/go/mobile/profiles/uaprof/8530_evdo/5.0.0.rdf"
Accept-charset: UTF-8,ISO-8859-1,US-ASCII,windows-1252,ISO-2022-JP,KSC5601,EUC-JP,EUC-KR,windows-1250,GB2312,UTF-16BE,Big5,Big5-HKSCS,x-...
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf5/rkvsf_core.php?can_t_figure_Hitchens-2RVo.Hajl.REPLY
Via: BISB_3.5.1.90
Accept: application/vnd.rim.html,text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml,text/vnd.sun.j2me.app-descriptor,...
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Profile: http://www.blackberry.net/go/mobile/profiles/uaprof/8530_evdo/5.0.0.rdf
Cache-control: max-age=0
Connection: close



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9