The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Why Christians Are Not Be Trusted....

Why Christians Are Not Be Trusted....
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Sunday, September 5 2010, 18:45:56 (UTC)
from *** - *** - Windows NT - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

...when retelling history. primarily because they lie and always have and always will...

They tell us that history "shows" that the simple message of Jesus, whatever the hell it was, was enough to induce people, halfway around the world even who never heard of Jews or anything pertaining to them, people who for centuries past had their own rich culture and religions, customs and traditions under which they had borne their own children, married and buried their parents, that these people, on simply hearing a lone disciple pain-in-the-ass-doorbell-ringing fellow tell them that a fellow named Jesus loved them, was enough to have them turn against centuries of their own traditions and beliefs...so POWERFUL is the message of Jesus.

What the Roman Church won´t tell you is that the Roman armies "converted" people to Christ, on pain of death...and this is how the religion was truly spread.

How can we know that?

By looking at more recent history, for a time in our modern past for which we have ample and unbiased evidence.

The Roman army spread Christianity to all corners of their empire...but the empire did not extend to China, Japan or India...and yet Christian missionaries visited all these countries...how then was their Jesus received? Did all who heard of him drop down in wonder? No. There were a handful of Christians in each place...they increased their numbers by first saving orphaned children and raising them Christian..and then by intermarriage. In none of these countries, without Roman arms to back them, did they do much business...even down to the present day.

Where else?

In Africa no one converted on hearing about Jesus until the Europeans came and outlawed their own religion...or took them to slavery in the New World where they were forced to adopt Christianity..as they were forced to fuck and work to death.

In the modern era...in the last 300 years there is no instance of any nation or tribe voluntarily converting to Christianity..and since it doesn´t serve the church´s purpose to be caught lying, they ignore their failures...but since there were no reliable or surviving eyewitnesses to the crimes committed by Christians as they forced people to Christ, the church feels perfectly fine in claiming it all happened by choice, with no coercion of any kind...seems kind of odd, even backwards, that for the time when there were no witnesses, the church claims it made converts easily and completely..yet when there are witnesses the church has to admit failure....why was the church so successful centuries ago while failing in modern times?

Why? Because they had no armies at their back...that´s the reason they failed to convert the rest of the world..had they had the time and weapons, they would have murdered everybody into Christ...as they would love to do now....



---------------------


The full topic:



***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9