Posted by farid from customer-148-233-78-77.uninet.net.mx (148.233.78.77) on Tuesday, June 10, 2003 at 5:14PM :
In Reply to: Difference posted by D from 92.52.26.24.cfl.rr.com (24.26.52.92) on Tuesday, June 10, 2003 at 12:58PM :
: The war is still ongoing unknown to those outside the conflict, and i am also outside obviously, but it is ongoing, IRaq did not get defeated.
***I think you´re halucinating...Iraq got "whatever" the United States decided it needed, at the moment.
Saddam pulled out of bagdad,
***I pulled out of Daisy Mae back in 66...and for the same reasons I´m sure.
he pulled his forces out of the defending cities to regroup and restrategise, which they are still in the process of doiing.
***Give us a break...you think the United States would put a guy in place and keep him there if he could SPELL strateragerize...let alone do it?
If they had not used tanks to smash the US advance like they did which you may or may not be aware of, if they had not employed the multiple rocket launchers, if they had not used rocket propelled grenades and rifles to attack oncoming US soldiers, if they had not attacked supply lines at night constantly, if they had simply laid down their guns, the US would have its way and take over all of Iraq.
***Hoo boy...am I gonna get you...you can´t take back this post. Tomorrow, when you´re sober...or drunk...you can read it and weep.
The difference is being taken over and being free, weapons are a defense, jjust like an axe can become useful when someones family is threatened
***Tell you what...if Saddam´s "weapons" are anywhere near as tangible as the axe was...he better call it quits. Or...isn´t that what he just did?
***You have GOT to be dreaming. Saddam wasa dog...but he was America´s dog all the way.
-- farid
-- signature .
Follow Ups: