Posted by Lilly from ? (126.96.36.199) on Monday, December 09, 2002 at 10:29AM :
In Reply to: Lilly-Mrs.Confusius First sort things out ... posted by andreas from p3EE3C350.dip.t-dialin.net (188.8.131.52) on Monday, December 09, 2002 at 7:33AM :
xxx Dear, sweet, idiot love of mine... (I'm being sarcastic, except for the "idiot" part).
xxx I DID ask why you were posting those articles. You have a habit of posting contradictory articles. Perhaps in the future we could skip the step where I ask you about them & you write up your thoughts before you post those articles?
xxx All of your points are obvious, now. However, keep in mind that articles are subject to perspectival readings. Clarification of one's intent in posting is always welcome.
; 4) The articles I posted on Hanan Ashrawi were to illustrate the sort of mixed signal she's either giving or receiving due to her ambiguity and lack of a clear delimitating her position against the Pal terror scene.
xxx However, the 4th point that you make is not relevant, as Hanan Ashrawi openly condemns acts of violence on *both* sides of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. What part of "both" don't you understand? Hanan *is* however, being subject to a huge *SMEAR* campaign here in the States for simply having a "pro-Palestinian state" stance. Understand, now? That article was the biggest pile of smelly horse shit I've ever had the displeasure of encountering.
: Refrain from catching for a high profile as self-annointed defender of the Palestinian cause/human rights at the cost of unreasonably and self-servingly painting others as the dark backdrop against which you can shine all the brighter.
xxx Who's being defensive? I was questioning your motives for posting certain articles not b/c I want to look better but b/c you're an absolute turd when it comes to revealing any of your inner thoughts (if you have any) on things. As for myself, I don't care who thinks what of me. Remember, I said my love was worth nothing?
-- signature .
Post a Followup