The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum

=> TERRORISTS UNTIL BUSH NEDDS THEIR MONEY

TERRORISTS UNTIL BUSH NEDDS THEIR MONEY
Posted by Maggie (Guest) - Friday, February 24 2006, 21:14:39 (CET)
from 69.225.39.109 - adsl-69-225-39-109.dsl.skt2ca.pacbell.net Network - Windows XP - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

The contradictions in the Bush Administration are countless. The Bush camp creates Arab terrorists, like Bin Laden, but protects them when they bomb the twin towers, because of their relationship to Bin Laden's Saudi family. The Bush clan will NOT negotiate with Arab terrosits, and punishes companies/countries that fund terrorist networks and operations, but it is ok if those countries/companies to bail him out at his hour of need.

If this is ok for Bush and his cronies, why isn't it ok for Hamas, who was legitimately elected by their people, to rule Palestine? Why does Condy, the Bush Aunt Jamima, have to rally the West to withdraw their support from the Palestinian people?

Oh I see, because in the Palestinian situation, WE tell them who rules!


By TED BRIDIS, Associated Press Writer
Thu Feb 23, 12:35 PM ET



WASHINGTON - Bush administration officials, trying to calm a political furor over allowing a United Arab Emirates company to take over a half-dozen U.S. seaports, told Congress Thursday they spent three months reviewing the deal and said all concerns about security were satisfied.

Earlier, President Bush declared that "people don't need to worry about security."

WHY NOT, MR. PRESIDENT, BECAUSE THEY ARE YOUR FRIENDS?

"We're not aware of a single national security concern raised recently that was not part of" the multiagency, three-month review of the deal that would permit the company to take over significant operations at the ports, Deputy Treasury Secretary Robert Kimmitt told a Senate Armed Services Committee briefing.

ROBERT, YOU ACTUALLY EXPECT US TO BELIVE YOUR BIASED AND SELF-SERVING THREE-MONTH REVIEW?

Representatives of key agencies that investigated the port deal — but not the heads of the various departments — sought to reassure senators.

TO NEW-CON THEM SOME MORE.

Indeed, the Capitol Hill briefing began with Democrats lashing out at the deal.

Brushing aside Bush's assurances, Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record) of Michigan, the panel's ranking Democrat, said the UAE backed the Taliban and allowed financial support for al-Qaida. Levin also charged that the UAE has an "uneven history" as "one of only a handful of countries in the world to recognize the Taliban regime in Afghanistan." He added that millions of dollars in al-Qaida funds went through UAE financial institutions.

CARL, THAT'S OK BECAUSE THE TALIBAN AND AL QAIDA WERE CREATED BY BUSH SENIOR'S CIA NETWORK, AND THEY ARE FRIENDS OF THE BUSHES.

Levin at one point noted that a special commission that investigated the terror attacks against the United States on Sept. 11, 2000 concluded that "there's a persistent counterterrorism problem represented by the United Arab Emirates."

REALLY?

"Just raise your hand if anybody (at the witness table) talked to the 9-11 commission," commanded Levin. There was no response among the handful of administration representatives.

THEY WERE ALL SLEEPING, AND DIDN'T HEAR THE QUESTION.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., also was critical, calling the approval process "a failure of judgment" because officials "did not alert the president, the secretary of the treasury and the secretary of defense" that several of our critical ports would be turned over to foreign country.

A FAILURE OF JUDGEMENT IS NOT THE CRUX OF THIS PROBLEM. IT'S "YOU WASH MY BACK, AND I WILL WASH YOURS". BUSH ORDERED THE UAE TO FUND AL QAEDA SO THAT HE CAN CREATE LEGITIMATE TERRORISTS TO PUT THE LIVING FEAR IN EVERY AMERICAN, SO THEY CAN RE-ELECT HIM. ONE HAND WASHES THE OTHER.

Sen. John Warner (news, bio, voting record), R-Va., and chairman of the committee, emphasized UAE's cooperation in the war on terrorism, noting that it allows a large number of port calls by U.S. military and commercial ships and that it had made its airfields available to the U.S. military.

But when a round of questioning began, Warner sharply asked Kimmitt whether the reviewing agencies considered UAE's role's in the transfer of money to al-Qaida and of nuclear components to rogue nations.

Kimmitt said those factors were taken into account.

Bush, talking to reporters at the conclusion of a Cabinet meeting earlier Thursday, said that "people don't need to worry about security."

REALLY? WHY HAVE YOU BEEN HARPING ON SECURITY ALL THESE YEARS, CREATINING NEW AGENCIES CALLED HOMELAND SECURITY, IF THERE WAS NO NEED TO WORRY ABOUT SECURITY? SO YOU ARE ADMITTING IT WAS ALL A FARCE, AND IT WAS THE EXCUSE YOU NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT THE PATRIOT ACT, SO YOU CAN SPY ON US.

Under secret conditions of the agreement with the administration, the Dubai company promised to cooperate with U.S. investigations as a condition of the $6.8 billion deal, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.

SURE THEY DID!

The U.S. government chose not to impose other, routine restrictions.

BECAUSE THEY KNOW THIS "SECURITY" THING WAS ALL A LIE THEY INVENTED TO SERVE THEMSELVES!

"The more people learn about the transaction that has been scrutinized and approved by my government," Bush said, "the more they'll be comforted that our ports will be secure."

YOU REALLY ARE A SLEAZE BALL.

The president said he was struck by the fact that people were not concerned about port security when a British company was running the port operation, but they felt differently about an Arab company at the helm. He said the United Arab Emirates was a valuable partner in the war in terror.

THAT'S BECAUSE YOU NEVER DEMONIZED THE BRITISH THE WAY YOU DID ARABS.

Critics in Congress, even before Thursday's hearing, had noted that the London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., which previously operated at those ports, is a publicly traded company while Dubai Ports World is effectively controlled by the government there. Sens. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Clinton have said they will introduce legislation to prohibit companies owned or controlled by foreign governments from running port operations in the United States.

WHY? LET THE ARABS TAKE OVER THE UNITED STATES. I'M SURE THEY WILL DO A BETTER JOB AT RESTORING SOME INTEGRITY IN THIS NATION AND IT'S PEOPLE.

Bush said his administration would continue talks with members of Congress — Republicans and Democrats alike — who have rebelled against the takeover. He said the briefings were "bringing a sense of calm to this issue."

I CAN FEEL THE CALM WITH EVERY LIE UTTERED BY YOU.

"This wouldn't be going forward if we weren't certain our ports would be secure," Bush said.

HOW DID YOU ARRIVE AT THIS "CERTAINTY"? BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE SECURITY FEAR WAS NEVER THERE? COULD IT BE THAT YOU ARE NOW ADMITTING IN SUBTLE BUT SURE WAYS THAT YOU INVENTED THIS SECURITY FEAR, TO BEGIN WITH?

In approving the purchase, the administration chose not to require Dubai Ports to keep copies of its business records on U.S. soil, where they would be subject to orders by American courts. It also did not require the company to designate an American citizen to accommodate requests by the government.

TO KEEP COPIES ON US SOIL IS TO TO SUBJECT BUSH AND HIS SLEAZE NETWORK TO INVESTIGATIONS, SHOULD SOMETHING SLEAZY HAPPEN.

Outside legal experts said such obligations are routinely attached to U.S. approvals of foreign sales in other industries.

NOT!

Dubai Ports agreed to give up records on demand about "foreign operational direction" of its business at the U.S. ports, according to the documents. Those records broadly include details about the design, maintenance or operation of ports and equipment. It also pledged to continue participating in programs to stop smuggling and detect illegal shipments of nuclear materials.

SURE THEY DID. AND BUSH PROMISED TO PROTECT THEM SHOULD ILLEGAL SHIPMENTS OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS FALL IN HIS NETORK OF TERRORIST HANDS.

"They're not lax but they're not draconian," said James Lewis, a former U.S. official who worked on such agreements. If White House officials negotiating the deal had predicted the firestorm of criticism over it, "they might have made them sound harder."

GROW UP!

The conditions over the sale were detailed in U.S. documents marked "confidential." Such records are regularly guarded as trade secrets, and it is highly unusual for them to be made public.

I AM ROARING...........THIS IS GOING FROM BAD TO WORST.

Rep. Peter King (news, bio, voting record) of New York, the Republican chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said the conditions are evidence the administration was concerned about security. "There is a very serious question as to why the records are not going to be maintained on American soil subject to American jurisdiction," King said.

WOW! EVEN A NEO-CON IS NOT CONVINCED OF BUSH'S LIES. THAT'S SOMETHING!

Another critic, Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y., added: "These new revelations ask more questions than they answer."

NAH!!!

In Lebanon, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Thursday that the agreement was thoroughly vetted in a review process that took approximately three months. "This is supposed to be a process that raises security concerns, if they are there, but does not presume that a country in the Middle East should not be capable of doing a deal like this." She described the United Arab Emirates as "a very good ally" and said "if more details need to be made available then I'm sure they will be."

SPOKEN LIKE A TRUE PHD HOLDER IN BUSH-CRAP!



---------------------


The full topic:



Content-length: 10640
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, applicatio...
Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-language: en-us
Cache-control: no-cache
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cookie: *hidded*
Host: www.insideassyria.com
Referer: http://www.insideassyria.com/rkvsf4/rkvsf_core.php?.5DZe.
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; sbcydsl 3.12; YPC 3.0.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; yplus 4.1.00b)



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9