The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: The Outsider

Re: The Outsider
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Saturday, July 5 2008, 0:44:08 (CEST)
from *** - *** Network - Windows XP - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

arrow wrote:
>"this is the only religion that requires its believers to eat human flesh and drink human blood"
>
>
>If that is true, wouldn't there be inconsistency in the biblical message? The whole Christian theology would then fall apart.

..there are numerous inconsistencies...the gospels hardly agree or anything...the central temet of Christianity is the promise of the Eucharist...be as kind and as decent as you want to be...imitate Christ in everything BUT, refuse to eat the human fleasha nd drink the blood of the Eucharist and you will NOT get into heaven. Vampirism and cannibalism are indeed crimes. I don't see where the "theology" holds together anyway.
>
>
>"plus some other strange things which, if a citizen did them, would also be crimes"
>
>What are they?

...well, Christians are taught that it's okay to accept the gift of eternal life...even though that gift would not be forthcoming UNLESS Christ, a totally innocent man if there ever was one, is brutally murdered. On earth, under the far more benevolent laws we have, any person accepting a watch, or eternal life, on the basis that FIRST a man has to be killed in order for the gift to be forthcoming..is an accessory to murder after the fact and therefore, since he benefits BY that murder, is as guilty as the one doing the killing...that plus hanging little gold miniatures of instruments of torture and murder, the cross, around the necks of little children...plus hanging a bleeding cadaver, as you'd find in any butcher shop, above the altar in a place of "worship"...while not all of these are crimes, they certainly come under the heading of inappropriate things to teach young children.
>
>
>"Clearly Jesus wasn’t the promised Messiah"
>
>By Isiah's criteria, he is.

...you never met Isaiah...I doubt you'd buy a used car from Isaiah. The Messiah was supposed to come and lead Israel to victory over its oppressors and place the Jews on top, on THIS earth..the Hebrews had to "paradise" for eternity. Jesus fialed to do this, instead he got HIMSELF killed...that wasn't the deal...the Church repeatedly redefined what the Messiah was supposed to do until, after 1000 AD they came up with a kingdom of god above a cloud and not on earth..plus, the Messiah, having come once and failed, was supposed to come another day...well, hells bells, his excecution did no good at all, there being even more sin and fornications than ever...and so he goes away to come again? Why come again? He failed the first time...what would be the difference the next time?

Would you place much faith in a plimber you called to fix your toilet, who left you drwoning in shit and said.."I'l be back another time?" Wouldn't your response be, "don't bother"....?
>
>
>"no Christian today could afford to save “sweet’ Jesus"
>
>John 18: "Then Pilate... said unto him, Art thou the King of Jews?... Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence."

...that's not the Messiah..that's New Testament stuff and the Messiah is an old Testament figure...hiw kingdom was of THIS earth..not a heaven somewhere. Besides...you're quoting from a Jewish history book...if you're impressed by it...okay. I'm not.



---------------------


The full topic:



***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9